A sad day for America

Breitbart is reporting:

Three-term Sen. Joe Lieberman fell to anti-war challenger Ned Lamont in Connecticut's Democratic primary Tuesday. .
.

. . . Democratic critics targeted Lieberman for his strong support for the Iraq war and for his close ties to President Bush. They played and replayed video of the kiss President Bush planted on Lieberman's cheek after the 2005 State of the Union address.

The American Spectator had this to say eariler in the day:

Welcome to The Chasm. It is almost possible to feel it splitting the common American ground as it falls away. It has happened before.

The Chasm is the reason the 1936 Republican candidate for Vice President of the United States against Franklin D. Roosevelt wound up in FDR's Cabinet as Secretary of the Navy. It is the reason Wendell Willkie, the 1940 GOP nominee opposing Roosevelt, wound up running missions for his successful opponent. It is the logic behind the entire British political system melding into one as the realization Winston Churchill had called the menace of the anti-Semite Adolf Hitler correctly, right from the start.

But Americans in 2006 are only now discovering The chasm, and there are Americans aplenty who still don't get it -- starting with Connecticut Democrats. One wonders about those continual polls that show our fellow countrymen so historically out of it that they think Lyndon Johnson was President during the Civil War.

There have been times aplenty in American history when the leaders of opposite parties bonded during crisis. Lifelong rivals Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas came together instantly when the two political and personal rivals who had vied for everything from the same woman to the same Illinois Senate seat and the presidency itself realized the fate of America rested on Douglas's ability to support the new President Lincoln. One of the first people President John F. Kennedy reached out to during the Bay of Pigs crisis was his just defeated opponent Richard Nixon -- who instantly rallied across The Chasm to his old friend and recent foe.

Much has been made by his far left opponents of Lieberman's willingness to play the hands-across-The-Chasm Douglas and Nixon roles. Yet the confluence of Israel's recent vulnerabilities mixed in with the battle for Iraq has suddenly -- or not so suddenly? -- drawn anti-Semitic venom. Is it a surprise that Lamont has accepted campaign help from Jessie "Hymietown" Jackson or Al Sharpton, the latter of whom has made a career railing against "diamond merchants"? All of this while Israel is fighting for its very life against opponents who use "ceasefire accords" as nothing more than rest stops on the way to killing more Jews?

. . . Democratic Party -- the party of Cabinet members, Supreme Court Justices, U.S. Senators, Congressmen, Governors, and others who happen to be Jewish -- the party of vice-presidential nominee Joe Lieberman -- has lost. The Chasm has opened, and Democrats are burning the bridge.

Shame.

As a Republican I should be happy. This will be good for my party. The Democrats have shown that they have learned nothing from the McGovern experience of the 1970s. This probably means that Republicans will keep control of both houses of the legislature this November and that is good for the nation.

However I am sad. In the first place Lieberman is a good man. On almost every issue other than national security he is a left-liberal and therefore totally wrong, but he is as true patriot and deserved to win.

Second, this demonstrates like nothing else could that the moonbats have firm control of the Democrat Party. America is fighting a war on three fronts. One is the war against Islamofascism in the Middle East, the next is the war to save our culture from the illegal immigrants and the third is the battle to save our political system from the lunatic left (who, if they had control would unconditionally surrender in the first two).

What would von Clausewitz or Sun Tzu have said about that?