Question answered?

When Mark Warner announced that he would not be running for President in 2008 I wondered what the Clintons might have on him. The online gossip sheet Radar may have the answer:

Is Mark Warner trying to skirt a bimbo eruption?

The former Virginia governor has decided not to run for president in 2008, saying he doesn't want to spend precious moments away from his wife and three daughters.

"This is the right time for me ... to have a life for a little while," said Warner, considered to be the only Democrat with any chance of taking on Hillary Clinton. But the man the New York Times declared in March to be "The Anti-Hillary" might actually have a lot in common with her husband.

D.C. insiders are speculating that his surprise pull-out may have been sparked by concerns that alleged past sexual indiscretions could derail his campaign—especially in the midst of the Mark Foley feeding frenzy.

"I can't believe no one has mentioned his philandering," a former political aide tells Radar, adding that she herself was subjected to Warner's advances in the late '90s and had heard "stories about Mark and many interns."

"This can't be isolated. I have to believe this stuff is all over," a former D.C. consultant tells Radar.

"It would be ironic if the anti-Hillary faction's best hope turned out to have the same problem as Bill," the consultant said.

If this is true then there is no doubt that it is the Clintons who are holding the files on Warner's sexual indiscretions.

If it isn't this it is something else. Nobody who has a reasonable chance of challenging Hillary for the Democrat nomination will be allowed to even get to the point of entering the race. Hillary's opponent, if she even has one, will be a blockhead like Kerry or Gore.