Showing posts with label Cox and Forkum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cox and Forkum. Show all posts

Thursday, April 10, 2008

We are so screwed



Cox & Forkum drew this political cartoon back in July of last year. They could have done it today. Who would have thought it was possible that the Democrat contest could have stretched out this long with no clear end in sight short of the convention? Hell, who would have though anything about this fraked up election was possible.

The Democrat candidates are locked in a desperate battle to see which of them can prove themselves more unfit to be president and the Republicans nominated the one guy in the party who has made it his special mission in life to destroy the Republican party from within.

The real contest seems to be the race between America and Europe to see which can destroy itself first.

Sunday, September 30, 2007

Final Bow


I have bad news for all of you who have enjoyed the work of Cox and Forkum. As of today they have stopped producing editorial cartoons. The above cartoon is their final work and is the cover illustration of their final book, Black & White World IV. The work of John Cox will still be available at his blog, John Cox Art and the Cox & Forkum website will remain online as an archive of their work.

The whole story is available here.

They will be missed.

Friday, September 28, 2007

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

HillaryCare 2008


Cartoon from Cox & Forkum
With all the other things on my plate lately I haven't had a chance to comment on Mrs. Bill Clinton's revived MediScam proposals. I'll put something up later this evening.

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

The vision of the Left


You might think that my comparing the American Left to communists or Nazis is just hyperbole, but it isn't. They are totalitarians. For proof just look at their socialized medicine schemes. Their goal is a society where all that isn't forbidden is compelled.
Cartoon from Cox & Forkum

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Let's all pile on!



As was pointed out in a comment, if Craig was a Democrat he would just say that this was his lifestyle and the entire left would be rushing to his defense.

However conservatives have actual standards and morality so when this happens to one of us we take hits, and rightly so.

To the Left all that counts is what policies one advocates. Bill Clinton was pro-choice so he could be credibly accused of rape and the feminist establishment would not turn on him. Al Gore says the politically correct things about global warming so he can have an actual "carbon footprint" the size of Alaska and no one on the Left cares.

Cartoon from Cox & Forkum.

Friday, August 24, 2007

Vick to do time


AUGUST 24--Michael "Ookie" Vick has agreed to plead guilty to a felony charge for his role in the management of a brutal dogfighting ring that was headquartered at a Virginia property owned by the NFL star. Vick, 27, is expected to formally enter his guilty plea Monday in an appearance at U.S. District Court in Richmond. As part of a plea deal, the Atlanta Falcons quarterback admitted that his Bad Newz Kennels operation wagered money--which he provided--in pit bull fights. However, "Vick did not gamble by placing side bets on any of the fights," according to a "summary of the facts" that was filed today in court. That document, a copy of which you'll find below, also notes that Vick "was aware" that three of his cohorts killed several dogs that performed poorly in test fighting sessions in mid-2002. The summary reports that "Vick did not kill any dogs at this time." Earlier this year, Vick, and two cronies "agreed to the killing of approximately 6-8 dogs" that fared poorly in testing sessions at his Smithfield, Virginia property. Some of the animals were drowned or hanged, and Vick "stipulated" that the animals died via the "collected efforts" of himself, and codefendants Quanis Phillips and Purnell Peace. Both Phillips and Peace previously pleaded guilty to federal charges and stated that Vick participated in the execution of eight dogs last April. Vick faces a maximum of five years in prison for his conspiracy conviction.

H/T: Cox & Forkum for the cartoon.

Sunday, July 22, 2007

The moonbat's cultural death wish


Were it not for the courage and sacrifice of the passengers of United Flight 93 who forced their plane into a Pennsylvania field, many in Congress might not be here today, with a gaping hole where the U.S. Capitol still stands. We wonder if this fact is appreciated by those trying to block final passage of the so-called "John Doe" provision protecting from legal action those who report suspicious behavior on airplanes.

Today's passengers have an advantage. They know what can happen. They know what to look for. They will not be taken by surprise, and they are willing to take action. But some in Congress would sacrifice their lives on the altar of political correctness.

Last November, six Muslim imams leaving an Islamic conference were removed from U.S. Airways Flight 300 in Minneapolis when passengers reported that the imams had acted in suspicious ways. Both U.S. Airways and the passengers soon became targets of legal action charging discrimination and racial profiling.

Also attending the conference, interestingly enough, was Rep.-elect Keith Ellison, D-Minn., who took his oath of office on the Quran, and who most recently compared President Bush's actions after 9/11 to Hitler's after the Reichstag fire. Ellison condemned U.S. Airways for "prejudice and ignorance."

So last March, the House of Representatives passed by a 304-121 vote the Rail and Public Transportation Security Act of 2007, with language protecting from such lawsuits airline passengers who might report suspicious activity. All seemed well.

But last week, as Republicans tried to have the "John Doe" protection included in final homeland security legislation crafted by a House-Senate conference committee to implement the 9/11 Commission's recommendations, they found Democratic conferees blocking its inclusion.

"Democrats are trying to find any technical excuse to keep immunity out of the language of the bill to protect citizens, who in good faith, report suspicious activity to police," said Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y. "I don't see how you can have a homeland security bill without protecting people who come forward to report suspicious activity."

Neither do we, and certainly the actions of the six imams last November qualified as suspicious. While at the gate, according to police reports and witnesses, the six made anti-American comments and provocatively chanted "Allah, Allah, Allah." On the plane, they asked for seat-belt extenders with heavy metal buckles, even though none was obviously in need of them, and then dropped them at their feet.

Last time we checked, there was no tenet of Islam that required them to leave their assigned seats shortly before takeoff, a violation of federal rules, and occupy the exit and entry rows of a jet aircraft, a pattern associated with the 9/11 attacks. All six moved — two to front-row first class, two in the middle on an exit row and two in the rear of the cabin.

Was it racism to report these actions? Stereotyping? Heather MacDonald of the Manhattan Institute notes: "A stereotype in this instance is nothing more than a compilation of facts about who has attacked American interests in the past and who, given what we know, is most likely to do so in the future."
We wonder how the plot by the Fort Dix Six to attack a U.S. Army base might have unfolded if a courageous Circuit City employee hadn't overcome similar fears to report a video showing the six engaged in paramilitary training while shouting "Allahu Akhbar!"

As a federal air marshal in Las Vegas observed: "The crew and passengers act as our additional eyes and ears on every flight. If they are afraid of reporting suspicious individuals out of fear of being labeled a racist or bigot, then terrorists will certainly use these fears to their advantage in future aviation attacks."


What bothers us is why some Democrats want to let them.


Because the elected Democrats in congress are stupid and evil and they are the bought dogs of the stupid and evil and greedy trial lawyers who oppose this law because it might lay the groundwork for general tort reform.


Ladies and gentlemen I give you exhibit 9,854,541,336,874,599,476 why I hate the left with every fiber of my being. Why I would gladly throw every last one of them alive and screaming into a giant bonfire. Then drink wine, dance and play the bagpipes while they burned.


Political cartoon courtesy of Cox & Forkum

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Cox & Forkum

The religion of perpetual outrage and bottomless entitlement.

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Cox & Forkum


The desire for peace is a fine thing, but when it drives you to ignore history in favor of an unrealistic fantasy it becomes nothing more than a precursor to more warfare. It was that impulse which drove Chamberlain to appease Hitler. It is that impulse which dives Ron Paul to urge us to "listen to al Qaeda" and it will be that impulse which will, absent divine intervention, destroy the Jewish state.