McCain still wants Lieberman

Bob Novak has announced that he will still be writing the occasional piece (this is good news). Here is the first of his post-retirement essays:

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Reports of strong support within John McCain's presidential campaign for Independent Democratic Sen. Joseph Lieberman as the Republican candidate for vice president are not a fairy tale. Influential McCain backers, plus McCain himself, would pick the pro-choice liberal from Connecticut if they thought they could get away with it.

But they can't get away with it -- and this has been made clear to McCain by none other than Joe Lieberman himself.

Lieberman surely doesn't know that much about Republican politics, but he has close Republican friends. One of them prevailed on Lieberman to tell McCain that a McCain-Lieberman ticket would be a disaster for all concerned, and especially for the GOP.

Actually, Lieberman is a heroic figure among Republicans for having risked his Senate seat to support President George W. Bush's war policy. But aside from the war, he votes the straight liberal line, including pro-choice on abortion. Lieberman's Republican friend told him that the Republicans would leave Minnesota in a state of disarray with a McCain-Lieberman ticket, alienating social conservatives who now make up the core of Republican voters.

At the heart of the desire for Lieberman as running mate is a basic strategic disagreement between the Bush and McCain high commands.

McCain's top strategists argue that the Bush coalition that won the last two presidential elections is dead and must be replaced by a new one that extends to the left, as Lieberman would.
Bush strategists disagree, asserting that McCain is getting around 90 percent of the old Bush vote and can win the election with a few moderates added in.

The Republican operative who urged Lieberman to dissuade McCain from picking him believes that there is still a very useful role for the maverick Democrat in this campaign: as McCain's secretary of state. While an announcement in St. Paul of Lieberman as vice president would bring groans from the assembled Republicans, placing him at the State Department would evoke a standing ovation.

At this writing, nobody knows McCain's choice. He is keeping the selection process secret, and his closest aides are in the dark. Could he still name Lieberman after being told by Lieberman himself that it is not a good idea? Nobody absolutely rules it out.

Selecting a vice presidential nominee from the opposite party has not fared well, partly because the two most prominent such selections quickly succeeded to a vacant presidency.

In 1864, Republican President Abraham Lincoln picked a pro-Union Democrat, Andrew Johnson, as his running mate. Johnson clashed continuously with the Republican Congress and became the first president to be impeached. In 1840, Whig President William Henry Harrison selected Democrat John Tyler for vice president. Tyler became president upon Harrison's death in 1841. Tyler found himself surrounded by old political enemies in a Whig Cabinet.

Those problems might be less serious for Lieberman should he quickly succeed to the presidency, however. He is on intimate terms with the McCain inner circle, especially Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.

Still, Republicans assembling in St. Paul have their fingers crossed that McCain will not press his luck by naming Lieberman as his running mate.

Friends, this is why I have warned you and warned you and warned you that John McCain represents the death of the Republican party.

John McCain wants to be a man of the left so badly that it is literally like a physical ache within him. Bob Novak doesn't lie and he doesn't get stuff like this wrong. McCain longs to make Joe Lieberman his running mate and the only thing which (might) stop him is the fear of losing the election.

If John McCain is elected he will use all of his power as the leader of the party to restructure the party so that there is no place within it for movement conservatives. He will install his people at the RNC and they will recruit McCain style left-wing Republicans to run for open seats and they will grant aid to incumbent Republicans in direct proportion to how far to the left they are willing to swing.

As the Republican party drifts further to the left the Democrats will be forced even further to the left to protect their brand. If you want an image of what the Senate will look like in 2016 at the end of McCain's second term think of 34 Lindsey Grahams sitting in the middle of 66 Barack Obamas.

That's what it will look like a bunch of center-left Republicans in a sea of far-left Democrats.

Left wingers for McCain

Sen. John McCain's campaign has announced a group of prominent Democratic and unaffiliated leaders and activists who have joined Citizens for McCain, a new grassroots effort headed by Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) to rally Americans of all political parties to support McCain's candidacy.

"Citizens for McCain is an organization within the McCain campaign for people who put country before political party and support the presidential candidate who has a proven record of bipartisanship," said Lieberman.

You can go look at the list if you want to, but the people you will find divide into two categories. One are bitter gender feminists who are angry about Hillary losing the nomination and are determined to punish the Democrat party by seeing that it looses this November.

The other category is made up of nobodies that you never heard of who see a chance to grab a little piece of the spotlight by associating themselves with a nationally known figure like Joe Lieberman in what will be seen as a "controversial" move. Not to mention the fact that they feel that the handwriting on the wall is telling of a McCain victory will put them on the side of the winner.

Republicans who think of this as good news need to take a step back and consider the fact that with the single exception of national security issues Joe Lieberman is a left-liberal. Oh I know he claims to hold center-right views on a handful of social issues but he proved that he cares absolutely nothing about those issues when he tossed them overboard to become Al Gore's running mate (just like any "conservative" who agrees to run with John McCain will prove that he cares absolutely nothing about his supposedly conservative principles).

Is this really the man who we want telling us who to vote for?

Are we really going to support a man who can so easily gain the endorsement of people who support left-wing economic and social policies which will ruin the nation?

I know that many people feel that to not vote for McCain is the same thing as voting for Obama but that is not the case. To be murdered and to commit suicide will both leave you dead, but there is an enormous moral difference between the acts. To vote for either McCain or Obama is to vote for someone who will do his level best to ruin and destroy the nation. If you refuse to vote for either of them you may still wind up with a ruined nation but at least you will not have participated in the ruin. You will not bear moral responsibility for it.

Lieberman slams Democrat Party, may vote Republican

From Financial Times:

The 2008 Democratic candidates are beholden to a "hyper-partisan, politically paranoid" liberal base that could endanger the final nominee's chances of winning next year's presidential election, Joe Lieberman, the former vice-presidential Democratic candidate, said yesterday.

In his most outspoken attack on fellow Democrats since he was unsuccessfully challenged last year by Ned Lamont, a liberal Democrat, for his Senate seat in Connecticut, Mr Lieberman yesterday said he might not vote for the Democratic presidential nominee next year.

He argued that George W. Bush and the Republican presidential candidates remained truer than the Democratic party to its tradition of a "moral, internationalist, liberal and hawkish" foreign policy that was established by presidents Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman and John Kennedy.

"The Democratic party I grew up in was unafraid to make moral judgments about the world beyond our borders," he said.

"[Today's Democrats] are inclined to see international problems as a result of America's engagement with the world and are viscerally opposed to the use of force - the polar opposite to the self-confident and idealistic nationalism of the party I grew up in."

[. . .]

Mr Lieberman called on Democrats to follow the words of Arthur Vandenberg, the mid-20th century US senator, who said that politics should "stop at the water's edge". Before voting, Mr Lieberman said he would first assess each nominee's platform - "just like any other voter would".

I always thought that Lieberman was the best man in the Democrat Party, which made it almost inevitable that they would drive him out of that cesspool of a party.